Skip to main content

Analyzing the News Coverage of the Dhaka Massacre


THE DHAKA MASSACRE

On the night of 1st July 2016, at 21:20 local time, the citizens of Bangladesh witnessed the worst terror attack in the country. Everyone’s lives came to a standstill as the news of twenty people being taken hostage by six militants in the city’s hub ‘Gulshan Café’ spread. TVs were switched on, phones were ringing and social media was buzzing with a number of speculations about the massacre. The assailants managed to kill 29 people using cold-blooded and barbaric means. The victims were of Italian, Japanese, Bangladeshi, Indian and American origin. Ten hours post the beginning of the attack, to gain control of the situation, the Bangladesh Armed Forces launched a counter-attack resulting in a siege that lasted 50 minutes. They managed to rescue 13 hostages and to kill five of the six assailants. The last one was caught alive. The attack came to an end after 11 hours, but managed to stay with everyone for much longer than that.

Articles from very prominent newspapers have been chosen in order to analyse the reporting on this topic. The analysis is of reports that came out the very next day of the massacre, i.e. on 2nd July. The articles chosen include:
1.      The Times of India’s front page article (with continuation on page 20).
2.      Business Standard’s front page article in a column (with continuation on page 5).
3.      Mumbai Mirror’s page 16 article.
4.      The Indian Express’s article.
5.      An online article by BBC News.

For a country that witnessed a very gruesome and monstrous that goes by the name of 26/11, news of the Dhaka massacre brought back terrible memories for all Indians. Any mention of the 26/11 cruelty still sends shivers down one’s spine. The very phrase “taken hostage” in the news was enough to make everyone stop their work and take a walk down memory lane. If any country could relate the most to Bangladesh at that very moment, it was India.

The Dhaka massacre, being one of the inhuman attacks in Bangladesh, has been subject to much speculation by the media, both national and international. Various assumptions about the attackers, the armed forces, the authorities and the whole situation were made. It is a well-known fact that 26/11 witnessed not only sadistic human behaviour from the terrorists’ end, but also reckless and insensitive human behaviour from the media’s end. Thus, this topic was chosen to see whether media reporting in this case was appropriate and careful, or whether it took inspiration from the recklessness shown during 26/11.

In order to analyse the reporting, articles from the top newspapers have been picked, including The Times of India, Hindustan Times, Business Standard, Mumbai Mirror and BBC news’ online forum. The motive behind picking such prominent papers is to understand whether or not media houses with the widest reach among citizens are delivering news appropriately and correctly.



1.      The Times of India
The Times of India report on the Dhaka massacre was found in a small paragraph on the front page, with a continuation on page 20. The majority of the report spoke only about speculations. Without offering much concrete information, the report was summed up leaving the reader deprived of any accurate knowledge about the massacre.

There is no proper format or organization to the report. The paragraphs do not follow a sequence and are found to repeat the same information over and over. Paragraphs 1, 3 and 5, all deal with what exactly happened in more or less the same words. The same information too is found repeated in the form of quotes by various different people, thereby delivering no new facts. The same content is framed in different ways to make the article longer:
a) “…taking hostages and exchanging gunfire with security forces…”
b) “…took customers and staffers hostage at gunpoint.”
c) “Some people are being held hostage at gunpoint inside the restaurant,” Monirul Islam… told The Daily Star newspaper.
d) “We are aware of what appears to a hostage situation in the Gulshan neighbourhood of Dhaka.”

Not following the pattern of a traditional report, this Times of India report does not even portray experimentation. It merely shows information recklessly scattered everywhere without a comprehensive flow. Indicating no real facts of their own, the Times of India article has taken bits and pieces from the articles of other newspapers and compiled them.

2.      Mumbai Mirror

The Mumbai Mirror’s report on the Dhaka massacre was found on the 16th page of the newspaper. It is a blatant copy of the Times of India report (or perhaps the Times of India report is a copy of it). Making no changes to the original article other than the addition of four extra lines in between, Mumbai Mirror did not mention the source for their report, which is Times of India.
Following the same unstructured and unorganized pattern, this report did not even correct the grammatical error found in the original report by ToI: “…what appears to (be) a hostage situation…” There is not just blatant, but also blind copying.

3.      Business Standard

The Business Standard’s report on the Dhaka massacre was found in a column on the first page of the newspaper. While the information here offers a good insight into the situation by answering the basic questions of ‘What’, ‘When’ and ‘Where’, its continuation on page 5 starts off with more or less the same information. The next paragraph then adds to the facts by discussing the assailants, but the paragraphs following it again explores the situation in a manner similar to paragraphs 1 and 2. Although making use of good grammar and simple sentences, the report still fails to follow a very structured format. The reader keeps coming back to the same information every few paragraphs.


4.      The Indian Express

The Hindustan Times’ report on the Dhaka massacre proved to be the most well-written article of the lot. It offers a lot of information that the other newspaper don’t, with the reader finding new facts in every other sentence. It discusses concrete information rather than speculations made by other media houses. Focusing solely on how the events unfolded, it does not try to make any assumptions by answering the question ‘Why’ on its own. The report follows an organized, structured format and clearly divides the information into different contexts. The reader witnesses a comprehensive flow of facts, making it a traditional report.

5.      BBC News (Online article)

The BBC News’ report follows absolutely no structure or format. It gives the impression of an article that was written for the sake of it. With facts thrown here and there, the report makes for a very disconnected piece of writing. The report is written in point-form which prevents the reader from recognizing a flow in the sequence of events. Moreover, the article is made of lesser facts and of more personal accounts of the journalist. Giving it an essay-like essence, the “report” focuses on personal experience and feelings. It deviates from the purpose of the report by influencing the way in which the situation is portrayed to the readers. It gives a more emotional than factual vibe.


With only one article following a structured format (the one from The Indian Express), most of the articles were found putting up any information anywhere. The articles give one the impression that they have been written just for the sake of writing something. Although they do not indicate any “sensationalization” of news, they fail to bring out the seriousness of the situation with accuracy. The frequent repetition of facts in the same article shows lack of research and importance given to the situation.

Thus, overall, while the media reporting was not reckless or insensitive, most of the articles do not provide information about an event that occurred just one day previously in a crisp and significant manner.

                                                                                                                 -Vaishali Singh

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Review of "The Tale of the Rose" by Emma Donaghue

 A Review of "The Tale of the Rose" by Emma Donaghue - Mayura Bhandari “The Tale of The Rose” is a retelling of the popular children’s fairy tale, “The Beauty and The Beast”. It is one of the short stories in the collection by Emma Donoghue, called Kissing The Witch . The story is narrated from the point of a young woman who describes herself as having an appetite for magic. She doesn’t desire suitors, finery or riches. When her father’s ships get lost at sea, her cushy life disappears. But without despair, she gets to work. She washes her father’s clothes, finding peace and satisfaction in it. When fortune smiles upon their family, her siblings ask for riches and finery, but she desires a red rose bud. Her father returns and hands her the rose, explaining that the price of that flower was that he had sold her to a Beast. Obediently, she heads over to the castle, nervous and excited for a new chapter in her life. She recalls the lore the villagers told her. About a young
Post a Comment
Read more

Psychological Analysis Of Waiting For Godot

Psychological criticism adopts the methods of "Reading" employed by Freud and later theorists to interpret texts. It argues that literary texts, like dreams, express the secret unconscious desires and anxieties of the author, that a literary work is a manifestation of the author's own neuroses. Here, we are going to apply the same form of criticism on Samuel Beckett’s play, ‘Waiting for Godot.’  Unanswered questions behind the characters behaviour are answered here. We would be looking further to the psychoanalytical approach, Sigmund Freud being the important proponent here. A major focus on the language and how dreams reflect our mental personality are given in his second essay, “Interpretation of Dreams.” The plot clearly states that Estragon has nightmares and Vladimir never addresses them and remains unhelpful towards it, being the one who is aware about their sufferings. The nightmares contain flashbacks and images of a gruesome and horrific event that has hap
1 comment
Read more

Marxism in Waiting for Godot

Samuel Beckett, the most eminent Irish playwright wrote ‘’Waiting for Godot’’ in French in 1949 and then translated it into English in 1954. This play has been performed as a drama of the absurd with astonishing success in Europe, America and the rest of the world in the post second world war era. For this reason, Martin Esslin calls it, “One of the successes of the post-war theatre” (Esslin, Martin, 1980) In this play, the two tramps, Vladimir and Estragon, wait expectantly to see a man simply known as Godot, a character who does not make an appearance in the play, despite being the titular character. The play begins with waiting for Godot and ends with waiting for Godot. Marxism refers to the political and economic theories of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, later developed by their followers to form the basis of communism. Marxism introduced ideas such as Dialectical Materialism, Alienation, and Economic Determination. Beckett’s ‘Waiting for Godot’ has a minimalist setting
Post a Comment
Read more