Skip to main content

The Youth: A Confused Generation analyzed


The Youth - A Confused Generation

The youth symbolize enthusiasm. The youth are believed to be the potential energy of a nation, perhaps its key to progress. But what good can the youth be if they are not fuelled properly? If they are left stranded and unable to fend for themselves? There can be only one outcome – confusion.
In India today, the youth are at this crucial juncture:  an unstable crossroad where the traditional meets the modern, the eastern meets the western, the conservative meets the radical. I believe this to be the primary source of our confusion.

Our exposure to Western culture, particularly the media, has opened our eyes to a society that we perceive to be more liberal than our own. So we look up to it, and imagine that we are indeed a part of this ‘Uotpia’.  This imagination (or ‘fantasy’/delusion) soon transforms to a belief. But when we wake up to the reality of our own society again, the dream feels misplaced, giving rise to dissonance.
Dissonance is the root of confusion and conflict. We are driven by an urge to explore, experiment, experience; an urge to gratify our desires - ranging from sexual, emotional to just a need to ‘look cool’.  But when our external environment (parents/school) does not permit such openness, we are forced to repress it. This leads to frustration.

Another factor that plays an important role is our mind. When it analyses certain rules and norms, it clearly views some as irrational. But can it take a middle path, where some ‘adaptive’ rules are obeyed completely, and the irrational ones are placed subject to amendment or adjustment? Maybe a compromise could be made on both sides, society and the young mind, and a collective solution could be arrived at.

A ‘grey area’ where ‘sanskaar’ is not confused with good manners and is ridiculed. Or where it is okay to adopt Western values but not tamper with the traditional.

- Amartya Chakrabarti

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Review of "The Tale of the Rose" by Emma Donaghue

 A Review of "The Tale of the Rose" by Emma Donaghue - Mayura Bhandari “The Tale of The Rose” is a retelling of the popular children’s fairy tale, “The Beauty and The Beast”. It is one of the short stories in the collection by Emma Donoghue, called Kissing The Witch . The story is narrated from the point of a young woman who describes herself as having an appetite for magic. She doesn’t desire suitors, finery or riches. When her father’s ships get lost at sea, her cushy life disappears. But without despair, she gets to work. She washes her father’s clothes, finding peace and satisfaction in it. When fortune smiles upon their family, her siblings ask for riches and finery, but she desires a red rose bud. Her father returns and hands her the rose, explaining that the price of that flower was that he had sold her to a Beast. Obediently, she heads over to the castle, nervous and excited for a new chapter in her life. She recalls the lore the villagers told her. About a young

Psychological Analysis Of Waiting For Godot

Psychological criticism adopts the methods of "Reading" employed by Freud and later theorists to interpret texts. It argues that literary texts, like dreams, express the secret unconscious desires and anxieties of the author, that a literary work is a manifestation of the author's own neuroses. Here, we are going to apply the same form of criticism on Samuel Beckett’s play, ‘Waiting for Godot.’  Unanswered questions behind the characters behaviour are answered here. We would be looking further to the psychoanalytical approach, Sigmund Freud being the important proponent here. A major focus on the language and how dreams reflect our mental personality are given in his second essay, “Interpretation of Dreams.” The plot clearly states that Estragon has nightmares and Vladimir never addresses them and remains unhelpful towards it, being the one who is aware about their sufferings. The nightmares contain flashbacks and images of a gruesome and horrific event that has hap

Marxism in Waiting for Godot

Samuel Beckett, the most eminent Irish playwright wrote ‘’Waiting for Godot’’ in French in 1949 and then translated it into English in 1954. This play has been performed as a drama of the absurd with astonishing success in Europe, America and the rest of the world in the post second world war era. For this reason, Martin Esslin calls it, “One of the successes of the post-war theatre” (Esslin, Martin, 1980) In this play, the two tramps, Vladimir and Estragon, wait expectantly to see a man simply known as Godot, a character who does not make an appearance in the play, despite being the titular character. The play begins with waiting for Godot and ends with waiting for Godot. Marxism refers to the political and economic theories of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, later developed by their followers to form the basis of communism. Marxism introduced ideas such as Dialectical Materialism, Alienation, and Economic Determination. Beckett’s ‘Waiting for Godot’ has a minimalist setting